EASY x_x

Graphics card

Intel Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Compared by performance index, specifications and load profile. The per-parameter difference comes first; the index follows.

Build your own comparison

Pick two models — the comparison page opens.

If the form is unavailable, use the ready-made comparisons below.

Verdict

Intel Arc A750 is 90% faster on the performance index.

The gap is decisive — these are different classes.

Intel Arc A750 leads on 4 parameters, GeForce GTX 1650 on 1.

Specification source: A — Intel; B — NVIDIA. Specifications verified on 2026-07-27

Key differences

Intel Arc A750

Strengths

  • Memory bandwidth
  • Rasterization
  • Ray tracing

Trade-offs

  • Power efficiency

GeForce GTX 1650

Strengths

  • Power efficiency

Trade-offs

  • Memory bandwidth
  • Rasterization
  • Ray tracing

Difference per parameter

  • Rasterization

    105
    40

  • Ray tracing

    65
    14

  • Video memory

    8 GB
    4 GB

  • Power efficiency

    225 W
    75 W

  • Memory bandwidth

    256-bit GDDR6
    128-bit GDDR5

Profile of both sides

RasterizationRay tracingVideo memoryPower efficiencyMemory bandwidth
Intel Arc A750GeForce GTX 1650

Specifications side by side

Side AIntel Arc A750Side BGeForce GTX 1650
Performance index105better40
Ray tracing index65better14
Video memory8 GBbetter4 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus256 bitbetter128 bit
Boost clock2050 MHzbetter1665 MHz
Power draw (TDP)225 W75 Wbetter
UpscalerXESSNo
Process nodeTSMC 6 nmTSMC 12 nm
ReleasedQ4 2022Q2 2019

FPS in popular games

FPS is shown only when a verified measurement exists for the exact CPU, GPU and settings.

Open the FPS calculator

Similar comparisons

Other pairs of the same class and pairs involving these models.

Deltas are computed from the EasyX-X catalog: relative performance indices and the vendor’s own published specifications. We do not copy third-party benchmark tables.