Graphics card
GeForce RTX 3050 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Compared by performance index, specifications and load profile. The per-parameter difference comes first; the index follows.
Verdict
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER pageGeForce RTX 3050 is 7% faster on the performance index.
The gap is noticeable but not decisive.
GeForce RTX 3050 leads on 2 parameters, GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER on 1.
Specification source: A — NVIDIA; B — NVIDIA. Specifications verified on 2026-07-27
Difference per parameter
Rasterization
6258Ray tracing
4620Video memory
8 GB6 GBPower efficiency
130 W125 WMemory bandwidth
128-bit GDDR6192-bit GDDR6
Profile of both sides
Specifications side by side
| Side AGeForce RTX 3050 | Side BGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance index | 62better | 58 |
| Ray tracing index | 46better | 20 |
| Video memory | 8 GBbetter | 6 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 192 bitbetter |
| Boost clock | 1777 MHz | 1785 MHzbetter |
| Power draw (TDP) | 130 W | 125 Wbetter |
| Upscaler | DLSS | No |
| Process node | Samsung 8 nm | TSMC 12 nm |
| Released | Q1 2022 | Q4 2019 |
FPS in popular games
FPS is shown only when a verified measurement exists for the exact CPU, GPU and settings.
Similar comparisons
Other pairs of the same class and pairs involving these models.
Build your own comparison
Pick two models — the comparison page opens.
If the form is unavailable, use the ready-made comparisons below.
Deltas are computed from the EasyX-X catalog: relative performance indices and the vendor’s own published specifications. We do not copy third-party benchmark tables.