EASY x_x

Graphics card

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090

Compared by performance index, specifications and load profile. The per-parameter difference comes first; the index follows.

Build your own comparison

Pick two models — the comparison page opens.

If the form is unavailable, use the ready-made comparisons below.

Verdict

GeForce RTX 4090 is 158% faster on the performance index.

The gap is decisive — these are different classes.

GeForce GTX 1650 leads on 0 parameters, GeForce RTX 4090 on 5.

Specification source: A — NVIDIA; B — NVIDIA. Specifications verified on 2026-07-27

Key differences

GeForce GTX 1650

Strengths

  • level

Trade-offs

  • Ray tracing
  • Rasterization
  • Memory bandwidth

GeForce RTX 4090

Strengths

  • Ray tracing
  • Rasterization
  • Memory bandwidth

Trade-offs

  • level

Difference per parameter

  • Rasterization

    40
    340

  • Ray tracing

    14
    300

  • Video memory

    4 GB
    24 GB

  • Power efficiency

    75 W
    450 W

  • Memory bandwidth

    128-bit GDDR5
    384-bit GDDR6X

Profile of both sides

RasterizationRay tracingVideo memoryPower efficiencyMemory bandwidth
GeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 4090

Specifications side by side

Side AGeForce GTX 1650Side BGeForce RTX 4090
Performance index40340better
Ray tracing index14300better
Video memory4 GB24 GBbetter
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Memory bus128 bit384 bitbetter
Boost clock1665 MHz2520 MHzbetter
Power draw (TDP)75 Wbetter450 W
UpscalerNoDLSS
Process nodeTSMC 12 nmTSMC 4 nm
ReleasedQ2 2019Q4 2022

FPS in popular games

FPS is shown only when a verified measurement exists for the exact CPU, GPU and settings.

Open the FPS calculator

Similar comparisons

Other pairs of the same class and pairs involving these models.

Deltas are computed from the EasyX-X catalog: relative performance indices and the vendor’s own published specifications. We do not copy third-party benchmark tables.