Graphics card

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3090

Compared by performance index, specifications and load profile. The per-parameter difference comes first; the index follows.

Build your own comparison

Pick two models — the comparison page opens.

If the form is unavailable, use the ready-made comparisons below.

Verdict

GeForce RTX 3090 is 135% faster on the performance index.

The gap is decisive — these are different classes.

GeForce GTX 1650 leads on 0 parameters, GeForce RTX 3090 on 5.

Specification source: A — NVIDIA; B — NVIDIA. Specifications verified on 2026-07-27

Key differences

GeForce GTX 1650

Strengths

  • level

Trade-offs

  • Memory bandwidth
  • Video memory
  • Rasterization

GeForce RTX 3090

Strengths

  • Memory bandwidth
  • Video memory
  • Rasterization

Trade-offs

  • level

Difference per parameter

  • Rasterization

    40
    205
  • Ray tracing

    14
    154
  • Video memory

    4 GB
    24 GB
  • Power efficiency

    75 W
    350 W
  • Memory bandwidth

    128-bit GDDR5
    384-bit GDDR6X

Profile of both sides

RasterizationRay tracingVideo memoryPower efficiencyMemory bandwidth
GeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 3090

Specifications side by side

Side AGeForce GTX 1650Side BGeForce RTX 3090
Performance index40205better
Ray tracing index14154better
Video memory4 GB24 GBbetter
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Memory bus128 bit384 bitbetter
Boost clock1665 MHz1695 MHzbetter
Power draw (TDP)75 Wbetter350 W
UpscalerNoDLSS
Process nodeTSMC 12 nmSamsung 8 nm
ReleasedQ2 2019Q3 2020

FPS in popular games

FPS is shown only when a verified measurement exists for the exact CPU, GPU and settings.

Open the FPS calculator

Similar comparisons

Other pairs of the same class and pairs involving these models.

Deltas are computed from the EasyX-X catalog: relative performance indices and the vendor’s own published specifications. We do not copy third-party benchmark tables.